Discussion:
Processed: bookworm-pu: package nfdump/1.7.3-1 (pre-discussion)
(too old to reply)
Debian Bug Tracking System
2023-09-24 19:40:02 UTC
Permalink
affects -1 + src:nfdump
Bug #1052561 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package nfdump/1.7.3-1 (pre-discussion)
Added indication that 1052561 affects src:nfdump
--
1052561: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052561
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ***@bugs.debian.org with problems
Jonathan Wiltshire
2023-10-07 11:20:01 UTC
Permalink
Control: tag -1 moreinfo

Hi,
[ Other info ]
I did not attach the debdiff because it would be too large and only consist
of upstream changes. No changes to debian/ (except dropping a backported fix
already in 12.1) are necessary.
What does diffstat look like, possibly with translations and tests
excluded? Let's see what sort of scale we're talking here.

Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire ***@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
Debian Bug Tracking System
2023-10-07 11:20:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jonathan Wiltshire
tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #1052561 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package nfdump/1.7.3-1 (pre-discussion)
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1052561: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052561
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ***@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bernhard Schmidt
2024-04-07 14:00:01 UTC
Permalink
On 08/10/23 10:19 PM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:

Hi,
Post by Jonathan Wiltshire
[ Other info ]
I did not attach the debdiff because it would be too large and only consist
of upstream changes. No changes to debian/ (except dropping a backported fix
already in 12.1) are necessary.
What does diffstat look like, possibly with translations and tests
excluded? Let's see what sort of scale we're talking here.
Plain debdiff
185 files changed, 25810 insertions(+), 28068 deletions(-)
Gentle ping about this. I'm totally fine if you think this is too risky,
I would go for bookworm-backports then.

[...]
I'll reach out to upstream about those embedded lz4 copy, right now it does
not look like one could build against an external library, in contrast to
zstd and bz2 support.
Upstream has released 1.7.4 which supports building against the system
lz4 copy. I don't want to upload this to unstable until it's clear how
to proceed with this bug. So

1.) Drop this request and keep the old version in bookworm, upload
1.7.3+ to bookworm-backports
2.) Upload 1.7.3 to one of the next bookworm point releases
3.) Upload 1.7.4 to unstable, then target that for one of the next
bookworm point releases (but the diff will become even larger)

What's your take on this?

Thanks,
Bernhard
Debian Bug Tracking System
2025-01-11 14:30:02 UTC
Permalink
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jan 2025 14:17:46 +0000
with message-id <***@powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#1052561: bookworm-pu: package nfdump/1.7.3-1 (pre-discussion)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1052561,
regarding bookworm-pu: package nfdump/1.7.3-1 (pre-discussion)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ***@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1052561: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052561
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ***@bugs.debian.org with problems
Loading...