Discussion:
Processed: bookworm-pu: package gss/1.0.4-1+deb12u1 (request for feedback)
Add Reply
Debian Bug Tracking System
2025-01-01 11:00:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
affects -1 + src:gss
Bug #1091842 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package gss/1.0.4-1+deb12u1 (request for feedback)
Added indication that 1091842 affects src:gss
--
1091842: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091842
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ***@bugs.debian.org with problems
Jonathan Wiltshire
2025-01-11 13:50:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Control: tag -1 confirmed

Please go ahead.

Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire ***@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
Debian Bug Tracking System
2025-01-11 13:50:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Jonathan Wiltshire
tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1091842 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package gss/1.0.4-1+deb12u1 (request for feedback)
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1091842: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091842
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ***@bugs.debian.org with problems
Simon Josefsson
2025-01-11 15:30:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Thanks. I have done the upload -- let's hope datefudge fix works on
all architectures.

/Simon
Post by Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Please go ahead.
Thanks,
Simon Josefsson
2025-01-14 08:50:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Hi

I uploaded 'gss', but I don't see it anywhere, shouldn't there be some
indication of this being built?

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gss
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gss&suite=bookworm

See below for ftp-master upload output. I got e-mail about
'gss_1.0.4-1+deb12u1_source.changes ACCEPTED into
proposed-updates->stable-new'. The d/changelog uses
distribution=bookworm. Is it the wrong upload queue? I didn't find
anything I didn't do here:

https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#upload-stable

Or is this expected, and the package is stuck pending in some manual
process somewhere?

2025-01-11 16:13:48,053 - dput[272776]: uploader.invoke_dput - Uploading gss using ftp to ftp-master (host: ftp.upload.debian.org; directory: /pub/UploadQueue/)
2025-01-11 16:13:48,054 - dput[272776]: hook.run_hook - running allowed-distribution: check whether a local profile permits uploads to the target distribution
2025-01-11 16:13:48,055 - dput[272776]: hook.run_hook - running protected-distribution: warn before uploading to distributions where a special policy applies
2025-01-11 16:13:48,056 - dput[272776]: hook.run_hook - running checksum: verify checksums before uploading
2025-01-11 16:13:48,057 - dput[272776]: hook.run_hook - running suite-mismatch: check the target distribution for common errors
2025-01-11 16:13:48,058 - dput[272776]: hook.run_hook - running gpg: check GnuPG signatures before the upload
2025-01-11 16:13:48,767 - dput[272776]: uploader.invoke_dput - Uploading gss_1.0.4-1+deb12u1.dsc
2025-01-11 16:13:49,417 - dput[272776]: uploader.invoke_dput - Uploading gss_1.0.4-1+deb12u1.debian.tar.xz
2025-01-11 16:13:50,114 - dput[272776]: uploader.invoke_dput - Uploading gss_1.0.4-1+deb12u1_amd64.buildinfo
2025-01-11 16:13:50,819 - dput[272776]: uploader.invoke_dput - Uploading gss_1.0.4-1+deb12u1_source.changes

/Simon
Post by Simon Josefsson
Thanks. I have done the upload -- let's hope datefudge fix works on
all architectures.
/Simon
Post by Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Please go ahead.
Thanks,
Simon Josefsson
2025-01-14 13:50:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Simon Josefsson
Hi
I uploaded 'gss', but I don't see it anywhere, shouldn't there be some
indication of this being built?
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gss
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gss&suite=bookworm
See below for ftp-master upload output. I got e-mail about
'gss_1.0.4-1+deb12u1_source.changes ACCEPTED into
proposed-updates->stable-new'. The d/changelog uses
distribution=bookworm. Is it the wrong upload queue? I didn't find
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#upload-stable
Or is this expected, and the package is stuck pending in some manual
process somewhere?
That's expected. The package is in stable-new now, and once manually
accepted by a SRM, it will be in bookworm-proposed-updates.
gss | 1.0.4-1 | stable | source
gss | 1.0.4-1+deb12u1 | stable-new | source
Thank you! Is 'stable-new' built by buildd's? Are build logs for
'bookworm-proposed-updates' available anywhere?

/Simon
Simon Josefsson
2025-01-14 18:10:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
[...]
Post by Simon Josefsson
Or is this expected, and the package is stuck pending in some
manual process somewhere?
That's expected. The package is in stable-new now, and once
manually accepted by a SRM, it will be in bookworm-proposed-
updates.
gss        | 1.0.4-1         | stable          | source
gss        | 1.0.4-1+deb12u1 | stable-new      | source
Thank you!  Is 'stable-new' built by buildd's?
No, proposed-updates is.
Are build logs for
'bookworm-proposed-updates' available anywhere?
In exactly the same place as logs for all other suites.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php has a "suite" dropdown,
where one can select "bookworm".
Okay, thank you! I will monitor it for any build failures eventually.

/Simon
Jonathan Wiltshire
2025-01-15 14:10:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Simon Josefsson
[...]
Post by Simon Josefsson
Or is this expected, and the package is stuck pending in some
manual process somewhere?
That's expected. The package is in stable-new now, and once
manually accepted by a SRM, it will be in bookworm-proposed-
updates.
gss        | 1.0.4-1         | stable          | source
gss        | 1.0.4-1+deb12u1 | stable-new      | source
Thank you!  Is 'stable-new' built by buildd's?
No, proposed-updates is.
Are build logs for
'bookworm-proposed-updates' available anywhere?
In exactly the same place as logs for all other suites.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php has a "suite" dropdown,
where one can select "bookworm".
Okay, thank you! I will monitor it for any build failures eventually.
Seems to fail in interesting ways on a variety of architectures:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gss&suite=bookworm

All available porter boxes are listed at https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi

Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire ***@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
Simon Josefsson
2025-01-15 14:10:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Simon Josefsson
Post by Simon Josefsson
[...]
Post by Simon Josefsson
Or is this expected, and the package is stuck pending in some
manual process somewhere?
That's expected. The package is in stable-new now, and once
manually accepted by a SRM, it will be in bookworm-proposed-
updates.
gss        | 1.0.4-1         | stable          | source
gss        | 1.0.4-1+deb12u1 | stable-new      | source
Thank you!  Is 'stable-new' built by buildd's?
No, proposed-updates is.
Are build logs for
'bookworm-proposed-updates' available anywhere?
In exactly the same place as logs for all other suites.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php has a "suite" dropdown,
where one can select "bookworm".
Okay, thank you! I will monitor it for any build failures eventually.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gss&suite=bookworm
All available porter boxes are listed at https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi
Sorry about that -- I will investigate. It builds fine on all archs in
unstable, but I suspect that 'datefudge' has some issue in 'bookworm'.

Since the time bomb is in a self-test, perhaps an acceptable solution is
to disable it if I can't fix it, or at least relax the time check by
patching code instead of using 'datefudge'.

/Simon
Jonathan Wiltshire
2025-01-15 14:40:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Simon Josefsson
Post by Simon Josefsson
Post by Simon Josefsson
[...]
Post by Simon Josefsson
Or is this expected, and the package is stuck pending in some
manual process somewhere?
That's expected. The package is in stable-new now, and once
manually accepted by a SRM, it will be in bookworm-proposed-
updates.
gss        | 1.0.4-1         | stable          | source
gss        | 1.0.4-1+deb12u1 | stable-new      | source
Thank you!  Is 'stable-new' built by buildd's?
No, proposed-updates is.
Are build logs for
'bookworm-proposed-updates' available anywhere?
In exactly the same place as logs for all other suites.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php has a "suite" dropdown,
where one can select "bookworm".
Okay, thank you! I will monitor it for any build failures eventually.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gss&suite=bookworm
All available porter boxes are listed at https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi
Sorry about that -- I will investigate. It builds fine on all archs in
unstable, but I suspect that 'datefudge' has some issue in 'bookworm'.
Since the time bomb is in a self-test, perhaps an acceptable solution is
to disable it if I can't fix it, or at least relax the time check by
patching code instead of using 'datefudge'.
Yes, if there's reasonable test coverage in general disabling broken ones
is fine by me.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire ***@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
Adam D. Barratt
2025-01-14 18:10:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
[...]
Post by Simon Josefsson
Or is this expected, and the package is stuck pending in some
manual process somewhere?
That's expected. The package is in stable-new now, and once
manually accepted by a SRM, it will be in bookworm-proposed-
updates.
gss        | 1.0.4-1         | stable          | source
gss        | 1.0.4-1+deb12u1 | stable-new      | source
Thank you!  Is 'stable-new' built by buildd's?
No, proposed-updates is.
Are build logs for
'bookworm-proposed-updates' available anywhere?
In exactly the same place as logs for all other suites.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php has a "suite" dropdown,
where one can select "bookworm".

Regards,

Adam
Jonathan Wiltshire
2025-01-15 11:30:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
package release.debian.org
tags 1091842 = bookworm pending
thanks

Hi,

The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.

Thanks for your contribution!

Upload details
==============

Package: gss
Version: 1.0.4-1+deb12u1

Explanation: fix FTBFS caused by an expired Kerberos ticket
Loading...